Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical Images
Research Article
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Clinical Images
Research Article
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
2025
:4;
100457
doi:
10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100457

Research topics and trends of isthmic spondylolisthesis: A bibliometric analysis and review of Literature

Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Dr. Moewardi General Province Hospital, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Department of Orthopaedic, Faculty of Medicine Sebelas, Maret University Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia

⁎Corresponding author: Rieva Ermawan. rievaortho1611@gmail.com

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Abstract

As the second most common type of spondylolisthesis, there is no bibliometric analysis on isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to fill that gap by exploring its research topics and trends through bibliometric analysis.

We conducted a Scopus database search on isthmic spondylolisthesis, yielding 700 articles. After refining our criteria, the count reduced to 519 articles. We extracted all 519 obtained articles in CSV extension and further analyzed with VOSviewer 1.6.19 and Biblioshiny.

and Discussion: The first article published in 1975 was the top globally cited article. Scientific production fluctuated since 1975 with steady growth peaking in 2022, while citations have tended to decrease. The United States leads in terms of published research on isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine is the top journal with the highest number of articles, citations, and impact factor. The top 10 most common author’s keywords used related to operative treatment. VOSviewer identified 6 clusters of co-occurrences. Strategic diagrams from 2002 to 2012 and 2013 to 2024 show the evolution of the theme.

This study is the first to summarize the publication growth on isthmic spondylolisthesis. Publications are expected to decline in 2024. The optimal surgical approach for isthmic spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Consequently, surgical techniques are the primary research focus, with analysis indicating ongoing development in spinal fusion techniques. Recently, ESS and PROMs have emerged as new but still infrequent topics. The absence of research on the correlation between those topics present a significant opportunity for researchers to investigate PROMs in patients undergoing ESS for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Keywords

Isthmic spondylolisthesis
Bibliometric study
Review
1

1 Introduction

Isthmic spondylolisthesis is the second most common type of spondylolisthesis. It occurs when one part of the spine slips forward over another due to a defect in the isthmus—a bony structure connecting the lamina, pedicle, and transverse processes of the vertebral bodies.1 The shift is nearly always between L4 and L5, or between L5 and the sacrum.1 Pain is the typical presenting symptom and is exacerbated by flexing and extending at the affected segment. Radicular pain may also manifest as the exiting nerve roots become compressed due to the narrowing of nerve foramina as one vertebra slips on the adjacent vertebrae.

Isthmic spondylolisthesis is known to have its onset in childhood, adolescence, or young adult, and most of those affected do not seek medical attention until symptoms manifest later in life.1,2 The prevalence in children under the age of 11 was 2.5 %.3 In the general adult population, asymptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis is reported 3.7 %–11.5 % of cases, and up to 18 % of adults undergoing lumbar spine MRIs have this condition.4 Males have a higher likelihood compared to females.5 Furthermore, the prevalence found to be significantly higher in certain sports with rotation or hyperextension movement of the lumbar spine.6

If left untreated, isthmic spondylolisthesis can lead to chronic back pain, nerve root irritation, and, in some cases, neurological deficits. These symptoms significantly impact a person's quality of life, restricting mobility and daily activities. Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF), being the most performed procedure for this condition, is associated with a significant risk for repeat surgeries which are undesirable. Spinal fusion also alters the spine's natural biomechanics by eliminating motion at the fused segment, increasing mechanical stress on adjacent segments. These, combined with natural aging, may accelerate the progression of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Those conditions become a challenge for treating isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Through a bibliometric analysis, we aim to identify what is being addressed in existing publications in a specific area or topic through quantitative analysis, aiding researchers and practitioners in understanding the current trend of research landscape, encouraging to conduct further research into unexplored and contentious areas, thus optimizing their future contributions and indirectly enhance clinical practice.7

2

2 Methods

On May 22, 2024, We conducted a Scopus database search on isthmic spondylolisthesis based on the publication's title, keywords, and abstract to obtain the data (Fig. 1). The publication period is set unlimited. At this phase 700 articles were found. As per our search criteria, we have narrowed down the results to include only journal articles written in English and finalized publications, leaving 519 articles. Our search query is as stated: TITLE-ABS-KEY ("isthmic spondylolisthesis") AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE , "ar") AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBSTAGE , "final") AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE , "English") AND (LIMIT-TO (SRCTYPE , "j"). All 519 obtained articles extracted in CSV extension. Scopus Analyze Result, VOSviewer 1.6.19, and Bliblioshiny were used to visualize and analyze the research trends derived from all 519 obtained articles metadata. VOSviewer and Biblioshiny are software tools for constructing a visual network of journals, researchers, publications based on citations, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, or co-authorship; identifying key terms and visualizing their relationships. For consistency, the author's keywords were used.

Study identification via database of the current article in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Using the Scopus database, we conducted data searches in the title, abstract, and keyword fields, initially retrieving 700 articles. After applying our predefined criteria, 181 articles were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 519 articles. This sample was then exported as a CSV file for subsequent analysis in VOSviewer 1.6.19 and Biblioshiny, enabling us to generate bibliometric visualizations (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Study identification via database of the current article in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Using the Scopus database, we conducted data searches in the title, abstract, and keyword fields, initially retrieving 700 articles. After applying our predefined criteria, 181 articles were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 519 articles. This sample was then exported as a CSV file for subsequent analysis in VOSviewer 1.6.19 and Biblioshiny, enabling us to generate bibliometric visualizations (Fig. 1).
3

3 Results

3.1

3.1 Publication growth

All articles were published between 1975 and 2023 (Fig. 2).The first and only article we found regarding this topic was published in 1975, discussing a basic lesion in isthmic spondylolisthesis with its risk factor and the importance of early recognition of the condition for better outcomes, had 390 citations and was the top globally cited article. Scientific production fluctuated from 1975 to 2023. Despite fluctuations afterward, publications on this topic steadily rose, peaking in 2022 with a total of 36 publications. Despite a growth in publication numbers, biblioshiny's analysis of the number of citations for the publication tends to decrease.

Analysis of publication growth and average citations for 519 journals obtained from Biblioshiny. (a.) Scientific production in isthmic spondylolisthesis over the year. (b.) Average citations per year regarding article publication in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Fig. 2a displays the number of articles published over time, with the x-axis representing the year of publication and the y-axis representing the number of articles. In the inaugural year of publication, 1975, there were 2 articles published. The lowest publication count was 0 during the years 1977–1979, 1983, and 1986. Fig. 2b illustrates the average number of citations per year for publications related to isthmic spondylolisthesis. Here, the x-axis represents the year of citation and the y-axis shows the average citation rate. The highest average citation rate, 6.38, was recorded in 1975, the first year of publication. In contrast, the citation rate was 0 in 1987 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 Analysis of publication growth and average citations for 519 journals obtained from Biblioshiny. (a.) Scientific production in isthmic spondylolisthesis over the year. (b.) Average citations per year regarding article publication in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Fig. 2a displays the number of articles published over time, with the x-axis representing the year of publication and the y-axis representing the number of articles. In the inaugural year of publication, 1975, there were 2 articles published. The lowest publication count was 0 during the years 1977–1979, 1983, and 1986. Fig. 2b illustrates the average number of citations per year for publications related to isthmic spondylolisthesis. Here, the x-axis represents the year of citation and the y-axis shows the average citation rate. The highest average citation rate, 6.38, was recorded in 1975, the first year of publication. In contrast, the citation rate was 0 in 1987 (Fig. 2).
3.2

3.2 Countries analysis

The United States has emerged as the leader in terms of published research (148 articles) on the current topic and the leading collaborator, partnering with 19 other countries. The published articles and IF of other remaining top 10 journals are as follows: European Spine Journal (n = 49, IF = 23), Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques (n = 25, IF = 18), Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine (n = 23, IF = 13), World Neurosurgery (n = 22, IF = 6), Spine Journal (n = 21, i = 15), International Journal of Spine Surgery (n = 13, i = 6), Spine Deformity (n = 12, i = 6), Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research (n = 11, i = 7), and Clinical Spine Surgery (n = 10, i = 5).

3.3

3.3 Author analysis

A total of 2047 contributing authors in the current topic. Mikko S. Poussa tops the prolific authors list with 17 articles with first publication in 1990 and the latest in 2019. Poussa's research focuses on isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. The remaining top 10 authors are: Dietrich K.A. Schlenzka (n = 16), Sangho Lee (n = 14), Seppo K. Seitsalo (n = 14), Kalevi E. Österman (n = 13), Rune Hedlund (n = 12), Jin-sung Luke Kim (n = 8), Kern Singh (n = 8), Alexander R. Vaccaro (n = 8), and Timo A. Yrjönen (n = 8). Poussa, Schlenzka, Seitsalo, Österman, and Yrjönen all come from Finland and frequently collaborate. Sangho Lee and Jin-sung Luke Kim are both from South Korea and have also collaborated. Singh and Vaccaro are both from the US.

3.4

3.4 Journal analysis

The topic isthmic spondylolisthesis was published in 143 different journals. Spine boasted the highest number of published articles (n = 72), highest citations (n = 5310) and highest impact factor (IF = 40). The published articles and IF of other remaining top 5 journals are as follows: European Spine Journal (n = 49, IF = 23), Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques (n = 25, IF = 18), Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine (n = 23, IF = 13), World Neurosurgery (n = 22, IF = 6).

3.5

3.5 Keywords & Topic trends

The majority of publications cover surgical procedures and the long-term outcome. Fig. 3a shows the author’s keywords to describe the content of their research paper. The most common term was isthmic spondylolisthesis (n = 161), followed by spondylolisthesis (n = 140). The rest are: spinal fusion (n = 75), an operative treatment for isthmic spondylolisthesis; lumbar spine (n = 53), a frequently affected region; spondylolysis (n = 48), a basic lesion on spondylolisthesis; other terms were related to operative treatments: TLIF (n = 49), ALIF (n = 40), PLIF (n = 35), and minimally invasive surgery (n = 28). Fig. 3b shows that certain topics have recently gained attention, suggesting a prior lack of discussion on these topics. Both spinal stenosis (n = 10) and endoscopic spine surgery (n = 13) appeared in 2020. However, only ESS has continued to garner interest up to this time. Minimally invasive spine surgery such as ESS has emerged as a preferred treatment for a wide range of spinal disorders, offering numerous advantages over traditional open procedures for various spinal conditions. PROMs (n = 11) first appeared in 2022 and have been the subject of ongoing research until now. PROMs are crucial for evaluating treatment effectiveness and care quality in spine surgery, ultimately aiming to improve patients' quality of life by reducing pain, enhancing function, and stabilizing the spine.

Biblioshiny analysis was conducted using the author’s keywords. (a.) WordCloud of Top 50 Author’s Keywords of articles related to isthmic spondylolisthesis. (b.) Trend Topics in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. The parameters for the keyword analysis are set as follows: the time range spans from 1975 to 2024, with a minimum word frequency threshold of 5 and an average of 3 keywords per year. In Fig. 3a, the size of each word corresponds to its frequency, with larger words appearing more often. In Fig. 3b, the line indicates the years a keyword appeared, and the size of the circle represents its frequency (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3 Biblioshiny analysis was conducted using the author’s keywords. (a.) WordCloud of Top 50 Author’s Keywords of articles related to isthmic spondylolisthesis. (b.) Trend Topics in Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. The parameters for the keyword analysis are set as follows: the time range spans from 1975 to 2024, with a minimum word frequency threshold of 5 and an average of 3 keywords per year. In Fig. 3a, the size of each word corresponds to its frequency, with larger words appearing more often. In Fig. 3b, the line indicates the years a keyword appeared, and the size of the circle represents its frequency (Fig. 3).
3.6

3.6 Co-occurrence cluster

The author's keyword co-occurrence network (Fig. 4a) revealed six distinct clusters. Cluster 1 (red) contains 33 keywords, Cluster 2 (green) includes 30 keywords, and Cluster 3 (blue) comprises 13 keywords. Cluster 4 (yellow) has 10 keywords, Cluster 5 (purple) features 8 keywords, and Cluster 6 (gray) consists of just 1 keyword. The overlay visualization in Fig. 4b and c illustrate the mean publication years and the average citations per keyword, respectively.

Network visualization of author’s keyword co-occurrence on articles covering isthmic spondylolisthesis. (a.) Co-occurrence clusters of the author’s keyword. The circle's size correlates with keyword frequency, while its thickness reflects co-occurrence strength. (b.) Mapping of keywords according to the mean frequency of appearance between 2010 and 2020; keywords in blue appeared earlier (2010 or earlier) than those in yellow (2020 or later). (c.) Mapping of keywords according to the mean frequency of citation per keyword; keywords in blue cited less (10; zero) than those in yellow (50 or more).Using VOSviewer, we performed a bibliometric analysis to generate network and overlay visualizations for research on isthmic spondylolisthesis. We employed a co-occurrence analysis with a full counting method, focusing on author’s keywords. Keywords appearing at least 3 times were included in the analysis, resulting in 97 of the 857 keywords meeting this criterion. The layout settings were configured with an attraction value of 2 and a repulsion value of 1. For clustering, we set the resolution to 0.60 and the minimum cluster size to 1 (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4 Network visualization of author’s keyword co-occurrence on articles covering isthmic spondylolisthesis. (a.) Co-occurrence clusters of the author’s keyword. The circle's size correlates with keyword frequency, while its thickness reflects co-occurrence strength. (b.) Mapping of keywords according to the mean frequency of appearance between 2010 and 2020; keywords in blue appeared earlier (2010 or earlier) than those in yellow (2020 or later). (c.) Mapping of keywords according to the mean frequency of citation per keyword; keywords in blue cited less (10; zero) than those in yellow (50 or more).Using VOSviewer, we performed a bibliometric analysis to generate network and overlay visualizations for research on isthmic spondylolisthesis. We employed a co-occurrence analysis with a full counting method, focusing on author’s keywords. Keywords appearing at least 3 times were included in the analysis, resulting in 97 of the 857 keywords meeting this criterion. The layout settings were configured with an attraction value of 2 and a repulsion value of 1. For clustering, we set the resolution to 0.60 and the minimum cluster size to 1 (Fig. 4).
3.7

3.7 Strategic diagram

3.7.1

3.7.1 First period

Fig. 5a's strategic diagram shows 8 themes from 2002 to 2012. Keywords across themes lack diversification, making differentiation challenging.

Strategic diagram of author’s keyword in isthmic spondylolisthesis. The 'Walktrap' algorithm was used for clustering, with a minimum cluster frequency of 5 and a weight index of 0.06. The time slices chosen were 2002 and 2012 because publications began increasing in 2002, and 2012 serves as a midpoint to assess advancements. (a) Diagram of the first period; representing keywords between 2002 and 2012. (b) Diagram of the second period; representing keywords from 2013 until 2024. The diagrams are divided into 4 quadrants: Motor themes (Quadrant 1/upper-right quadrant), Niche themes (Quadrant 2/upper-left quadrant), Emerging or declining themes (Quadrant 3/lower-left quadrant), and Basic themes (Quadrant 4/lower-right quadrant) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5 Strategic diagram of author’s keyword in isthmic spondylolisthesis. The 'Walktrap' algorithm was used for clustering, with a minimum cluster frequency of 5 and a weight index of 0.06. The time slices chosen were 2002 and 2012 because publications began increasing in 2002, and 2012 serves as a midpoint to assess advancements. (a) Diagram of the first period; representing keywords between 2002 and 2012. (b) Diagram of the second period; representing keywords from 2013 until 2024. The diagrams are divided into 4 quadrants: Motor themes (Quadrant 1/upper-right quadrant), Niche themes (Quadrant 2/upper-left quadrant), Emerging or declining themes (Quadrant 3/lower-left quadrant), and Basic themes (Quadrant 4/lower-right quadrant) (Fig. 5).
3.7.2

3.7.2 Second period

Fig. 5b's strategic diagram for 2012–2023 shows twenty-two themes with greater thematic diversity than the previous period.

4

4 Discussion

4.1

4.1 Publication growth

Scientific production fluctuated but showed an overall upward trend reflecting the growing interest and engagement from researchers, peaking in 2022. Most research focuses on surgical techniques such as comparing different techniques or evaluating their short-term and long-term outcomes. This proliferation of studies likely stems from the ongoing controversy surrounding the optimal surgical approach for this condition. However, publications are expected to decline in 2024, currently showing only five related publications. Despite its status as the second most common type among spondylolisthesis cases, its incidence in the general population which ranges only from 4 % to 8 % might explain the current waning of research interest.2

4.2

4.2 Countries

The United States has played a pivotal role in advancing spine science since 1829, as evidenced by the significant contributions of American surgeons and the establishment of numerous spine-related medical societies in America.8 The Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS), founded in 1973, focuses on advancing surgical techniques, diagnosis, and treatment for cervical spine disorders. In similar spirit, the Lumbar Spine Research Society started in 2008. North American Spine Society (NASS), established in 1985, leads efforts to advance knowledge, excellence, and patient outcomes in spine health.

The leading contribution of certain countries to publications on this topic may be supported by a large number of funding sponsors. Further analysis shows many institutional funders are based in the US and China. However, this conclusion remains uncertain due to the presence of many undefined institutional funders.

4.3

4.3 Author and journal analysis

There is a correlation between the top prolific authors, locations, and collaboration; where the majority come from the same country and have collaborated. This should encourage collaboration in future research. Spine is a pioneering journal founded in 1976 and dedicated exclusively to spinal research, which has led to its highest publication record in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Its legacy continued with the launch of the Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques (1988), which ranks third. Additionally, the European Spine Journal (1991), holds the second position. Since then, numerous spine-focused journals have emerged with more anticipated in the future. These findings offer valuable guidance for researchers to decide where to publish, as higher impact factors are typically esteemed.

4.4

4.4 The most productive and recent keywords

Fig. 3b highlights current trending topics: ESS and PROMs. Open spinal surgery has a long recovery time, and has several complications. Minimally invasive techniques such as ESS have emerged as an alternative, with reduced tissue damage and improved patient outcomes.9 Initially used for lumbar discectomy and simple nerve decompression, ESS is now possible to safely achieve spinal fusion due to the advancement of percutaneous screw fixation systems.10–13 However, the efficacy of ESS for spinal fusion has not been conclusively shown to yield superior outcomes.14 Publications regarding the application of endoscopic spine surgery in isthmic spondylolisthesis remain a developing trend and are still relatively few. PROMs assess an individual's health perception using questionnaires. It remains a prominent topic, with numerous publications comparing clinical outcomes across various methods.

4.5

4.5 Keyword Co-occurrence cluster

Cluster 1 (red) (Fig. 4a) revolves around the general characteristics of spondylolisthesis. It commonly occurs in the L5-S1 due to higher mechanical stress compared to above portion.15 Instability in spondylolisthesis causes symptoms such as hamstring tightness, lower back pain, or buttock pain exacerbated by spinal extension.16,17 Low-back pain, the predominant symptom, can be evaluated using The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).18 Lateral lumbar plain radiographs are recommended for their quick results, affordability, and availability.19 Radiculopathy may also occur, warranting MRI evaluation.20

Cluster 2 (green) (Fig. 4a) revolves around operative treatment for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Surgical management is an option in cases with high slippage risk, symptomatic, or not achieving satisfactory results after conservative treatment. The mainstay of surgical principles are decompression, stabilization and fusion.21 Spino-pelvic parameters can be assessed using whole standing postero-anterior and lateral radiographs. This aims to analyze postoperative spinal alignment and aids surgical planning. PLF and LIF are the most popular fusion techniques.22 PLIF is widely utilized and associated with higher fusion rates compared to PLF.22–25 Circumferential fusion effectively treats all grades of isthmic spondylolisthesis with an acceptable complication rate.26–28 However, the optimal surgical approach for isthmic spondylolisthesis remains contentious due to its varying advantages and disadvantages.

Cluster 3 (Blue) (Fig. 4a) revolves around ALIF. By providing direct midline view of the disc space and extensive lateral exposure of the vertebral body, ALIF facilitates aggressive correction of lordosis and restoration of foraminal height.29 ALIF can be considered as an option to directly decompress foraminal stenosis in adults with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis, and may be superior in terms of radiographic measures than TLIF.30,31 However, approach-related complications such as retrograde ejaculation, and visceral and vascular injury are associated with ALIF.29

Cluster 4 (yellow) (Fig. 4a) mainly revolves around identifying and diagnosing spondylolisthesis. Understanding epidemiology can assist medical practitioners in identifying potential diagnoses through a patient's medical history and physical examination. Differentiating the type and grading of the slip angle guides further management. Dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a congenital defect which is present from birth. While the isthmic, the defect is usually present by the age of 7, but the slip may appear only some years later.1 Grade I-II are low-grade spondylolisthesis and grade III-IV are high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Cluster 5 (purple) (Fig. 4a) revolves around FEA. FEA helps to determine how organs and tissues react to loads, enhancing the understanding of biomechanics in healthy or pathological conditions.32 It is useful for evaluating biomaterials for implant design, predicting mechanical stress distribution and helping prevent future pathologies caused by incorrect implant positioning.33,34 FEA can analyze spine biomechanics before and after surgery, allowing surgeons to analyze the pros and cons of different internal fixation methods for spine repair.35,36

Cluster 6 (gray) (Fig. 4a) contains only one keyword, "discography”. Discography is a diagnostic test for identifying intervertebral discs pathological feature, involves injecting a contrast agent into the disc's nucleus pulposus under X-ray, CT, or MRI.37 It is is now rarely used due to the risk of the procedure and its complications, which may explain its infrequent mention.

4.6

4.6 Strategic diagram

4.6.1

4.6.1 First period (2002–2012)

Fig. 5a's strategic diagram themes lack diversification, making differentiation challenging. This could be attributed by the publication which began tend to increase in 2002.

4.6.2

4.6.2 Second period (2013–2024)

Greater thematic diversity in Fig. 5b may be due to the progression and refinement of the existing topics. Three themes focusing on pre-operative and intraoperative imaging modalities fall under Q1, indicating these important themes have been well-developed. Five themes in Q2 discussing orthopedic implants, which was in quadrant 4 in the previous period (Fig. 5a). This shift indicates that the topic has become well-developed but isolated. Four themes in Q3 suggest emerging or vanishing ideas. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, pars defect, pseudoarthrosis, and disc degeneration, absent in the previous period (Fig. 5a), are now emerging themes for 2013–2024 but remain marginal. Ten themes in Q4 are foundational but underdeveloped. The largest pink circle represents the theme of surgical approaches for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Despite being frequently discussed, there is still uncertainty about the best technique due to its varying advantages and disadvantages. Themes about spinal alignment and adjacent segment disease appear in this quadrant, which was absent in the previous period (Fig. 5a).

4.7

4.7 Limitations

While the bibliometric research method offers an overview of discussions on isthmic spondylolisthesis, readers need a basic understanding of the topic for better comprehension. The current bibliometric study we only incorporated one database. While Scopus being the largest and renowned database and missing keywords may be covered by the number of articles included, this might still reduce the robustness of the results. In addition, we excluded non-English articles, which may introduce bias and reduce the generalizability.

5

5 Conclusion

This study is the first to summarize the publication growth on isthmic spondylolisthesis. Publications are expected to decline in 2024. The optimal surgical approach for isthmic spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Consequently, surgical techniques are the primary research focus, with analysis indicating ongoing development in spinal fusion techniques. Recently, ESS and PROMs have emerged as new but still infrequent topics. The absence of research on the correlation between those topics present a significant opportunity for researchers to investigate PROMs in patients undergoing ESS for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Ethical statement

There are no live subjects (human or animal) in this article and etichal statement is not applicable.

Guardian/patient's consent

There are no human subjects in this article and informed consent is not applicable. This manuscript titled “Research Topics and Trends of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Literature” is a bibliometric analysis that uses sample data from the Scopus database in the form of articles related to isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Financial Support and sponsorship

There are no financial support or sponsorship in the process of writing this paper.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Mellisa Gani: Writing, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Visualization. Rieva Ermawan: Writing, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Supervision. Nanang Wiyono: Methodology, Validation, Supervision, Project administration. Rhyan Darma Saputra: Resources, Validation, Supervision, Project administration. Hubertus Corrigan: Methodology, Supervision, Project administration.

References

  1. , , , . Apley and Solomon's System of Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Isthmic Spondylolisthesis [Internet] 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Prevalence of incidentally detected spondylolysis in children. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2022;83(1):127.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al . Isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults… a review of the current literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jul;101:124-130.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2009 Jan;34(2):199-205.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , et al . Epidemiology, treatment, and performance-based outcomes in American professional baseball players with symptomatic spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Aug 14;48(11):2765-2773.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285-296.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , et al . Brief history of spinal neurosurgical societies in the United States: Part 1. Neurospine. 2019 Dec 31;16(4):631-636.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . The role and future of endoscopic spine surgery: a narrative review. Neurospine. 2023 Mar 31;20(1):43-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a technical review. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):100.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , et al . Full-endoscopic uniportal decompression in disc Herniations and stenosis of the thoracic spine using the Interlaminar, extraforaminal, or transthoracic retropleural approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Aug;29(2):157-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , et al . Posterior endoscopic cervical decompression in metastatic cervical spine tumors: an alternative to palliative surgery. JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews. 2022 Nov;6(11)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug 20;19(S1):52-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , et al . Evolution of spinal endoscopic surgery. Neurospine. 2019 Mar 31;16(1):6-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Spondylolisthesis [Internet] 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the pediatric population: a Review. Semin Spine Surg. 2014 Dec;26(4):230-237.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Classification in brief: the meyerding classification system of spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Apr 10;478(5):1125-1130.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , et al . Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: a systematic review. J Craniovertebral Junction Spine. 2022;13(4):378.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , et al . Detection of lumbar spondylolisthesis from X-ray images using Deep Learning Network. J Clin Med. 2022;11(18):5450.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , . Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: a review of the literature. J Orthop. 2018 Jun;15(2):404-407.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis using long arm screw: a literature review. Annals of Medicine & Surgery. 2022 Jan;73
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , et al . Posterolateral fusion versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Global Spine J. 2021 May 12;12(5):990-1002.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . A comprehensive comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for the treatment of isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;188
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Comparison of posterolateral lumbar fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for patients younger than 60 years with Isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2014 Nov;39(24)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , et al . Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for the treatment of Isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication. 2017 Aug;30(7)
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with circumferential arthrodesis (alif and posterior fixation): correction, fusion and indirect decompression. Acta Orthop Belg. 2021 Dec;87(4):787-794.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , et al . Adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication. 2022 Apr 7;35(8)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Comparison between instrumented Mini-TLIF and instrumented circumferential fusion in adult low-grade lytic spondylolisthesis : can mini-TLIF with PPF replace circumferential fusion? Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2009;45(2):74.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , . Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , et al . 61. alif vs TLIF for Isthmic spondylolisthesis: differences in radiographic outcomes. Spine J. 2020 Sept;20(9)
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , et al . Alif versus TLIF for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis: alif demonstrates superior segmental and regional radiographic outcomes and clinical improvements across more patient-reported outcome measures domains. Spine. 2022 Feb 3;47(11):808-816.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . What is finite element analysis? Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication. 2020 Jul 14;33(8):323-324.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , . Finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics. 2022:637-658.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , . A critical review on the three-dimensional finite element modelling of the compression therapy for chronic venous insufficiency. Proc IME H J Eng Med. 2019 Jul 18;233(11):1089-1099.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , . Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Biomed Eng Online. 2012 Jun 18;11(1)
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , et al . Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis repair with various fixation options: a finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct;21:10.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Progress in discography. Spine Surgery and Related Research. 2023 Mar 27;7(2):129-135.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections